International trends and constructive models of agile governance for generative artificial intelligence

CHI Shunyu; DU Anqi

doi:10.11959/j.issn.2096-6652.202434

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

International trends and constructive models of agile governance for generative artificial intelligence

Special Column: Artificial Intelligence Trustworthiness and Governance | 更新时间：2024-11-04

- International trends and constructive models of agile governance for generative artificial intelligence
- Chinese Journal of Intelligent Science and Technology Vol. 6, Issue 3, Pages: 402-412(2024)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国政法大学法与经济学研究院，北京 100088
  2.中国信息通信研究院，北京 100191
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  The National Social Science Foundation of China(22CFX055)
- DOI：10.11959/j.issn.2096-6652.202434
  CLC： TP18;D035;F49
- Received：18 April 2024，
  
  Revised：2024-07-29，
  
  Published：15 September 2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
迟舜雨,杜安琪.生成式人工智能敏捷治理的国际趋势与建构模式[J].智能科学与技术学报,2024,06(03):402-412.

CHI Shunyu,DU Anqi.International trends and constructive models of agile governance for generative artificial intelligence[J].Chinese Journal of Intelligent Science and Technology,2024,06(03):402-412.
迟舜雨,杜安琪.生成式人工智能敏捷治理的国际趋势与建构模式[J].智能科学与技术学报,2024,06(03):402-412. DOI： 10.11959/j.issn.2096-6652.202434.

CHI Shunyu,DU Anqi.International trends and constructive models of agile governance for generative artificial intelligence[J].Chinese Journal of Intelligent Science and Technology,2024,06(03):402-412. DOI： 10.11959/j.issn.2096-6652.202434.

摘要

敏捷治理作为一种新的治理范式，有助于提升生成式人工智能治理水平。通过分析生成式人工智能的治理需求与发展挑战，揭示了传统治理模式的不足，并认为以多元共治、灵活的治理依据和迭代过程为核心特征的敏捷治理能够有效平衡技术创新与风险控制的需求，可以弥补传统治理范式在生成式人工智能治理的局限。在审视了国际敏捷治理的实践后，提出了适用于中国的生成式人工智能敏捷治理策略建议。为保障中国生成式人工智能的高质量发展和高水平安全，应在多元参与的基础上进一步发展多元共治模式，加强硬法与软法之间的互动，并逐步丰富生成式人工智能的治理工具箱。

Abstract

Agile governance

as a new paradigm of governance

is conducive to enhancing the governance level of generative artificial intelligence. By analyzing the governance needs and development challenges of generative artificial intelligence

the inadequacies of traditional governance models were revealed. It was believed that agile governance

characterized by multi-stakeholder co-governance

flexible governance basis

and iterative processes

could effectively balance the needs of technological innovation and risk control

and compensate for the limitations of traditional governance paradigms in the governance of generative artificial intelligence. After examining the international practices of agile governance

suggestions for agile governance strategies suitable for generative artificial intelligence in China were proposed. To ensure the high-quality development and high-level safety of generative artificial intelligence in China

it is necessary to further develop a multi-stakeholder co-governance model on the basis of multi-participation

strengthen the interaction between hard law and soft law

and gradually enrich the governance toolkit of generative artificial intelligence.

关键词

Keywords

references

郑南宁. 人工智能新时代[J]. 智能科学与技术学报, 2019, 1(1): 1-3. ZHENG N N. The new area of artificial intelligence[J]. Chinese Journal of Intelligence Science and Technology, 2019, 1(1): 1-3.

DRUCKER P F. Management challenges for the 21st century[M]. New York: HarperBusiness, 1999.

CALO R. Artificial intelligence policy: a premier and roadmap[J]. University of California, Davis Law Review, 2017, 51: 399-435.

中国信息通信研究院, 中国科学院. 大模型治理蓝皮报告: 从规则走向实践[R]. 2023.

CAICT, ICT. Large model governance blue paper report- from rules to practice[R]. 2023.

SCHWAB K, DAVIS N. Shaping the future of the fourth industrial revolution: a guide to building a better world[M]. Currency, 2018: 307-314.

World Economic Forum. Agile governance: reimagining policy-making in the fourth industrial revolution[A]. 2018.

KAAL W A, VERMEULEN E P M. How to regulate disruptive innovation - from facts to data[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017: 169-209.

刘艳红. 生成式人工智能的三大安全风险及法律规制: 以ChatGPT为例[J]. 东方法学, 2023(4): 29-43.

LIU Y H. On the three security risks and legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence[J]. Oriental Law, 2023(4): 29-43.

张凌寒, 于琳. 从传统治理到敏捷治理: 生成式人工智能的治理范式革新[J]. 电子政务, 2023(9): 2-13.

ZHANG L H, YU L. From traditional governance to agile governance: governance paradigm innovation of generative artificial intelligence[J]. E-Government, 2023(9): 2-13.

薛澜, 赵静. 走向敏捷治理: 新兴产业发展与监管模式探究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(8): 28-34.

XUE L, ZHAO J. Toward agile governance: the pattern of emerging industry development and regulation[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2019(8): 28-34.

丁晓东. 论算法的法律规制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(12): 138-159, 203.

DING X D. On the legal regulation of algorithms[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2020(12): 138-159, 203.

于文轩. ChatGPT与敏捷治理[J]. 学海, 2023(2): 52-57.

YU W X. ChatGPT and agile governance[J]. Academia Bimestris, 2023(2): 52-57.

FUI-HOON NAH F, ZHENG R L, CAI J Y, et al. Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration[J]. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 2023, 25(3): 277-304.

EVAN J, OROY K. Prospects of AI: assessing potential, managing risks, and ethical frontiers[R]. Easychair, 2024: 12681.

陈天昊, 徐玮. 规范敏捷式监管: 金融数据开放的监管挑战与完善路径[J]. 治理研究, 2023, 39(6): 142-156, 160.

CHEN T H, XU W. Normative agile regulation: regulatory challenges and improvement paths for financial data openness[J]. Governance Studies, 2023, 39(6): 142-156, 160.

VALLE-CRUZ D, CRIADO J I, SANDOVAL-ALMAZÁN R, et al. Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: from agenda-setting to policy evaluation[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2020, 37(4): 101509.

OLEJNICZAK K, BORKOWSKA-WASZAK S, DOMARADZKA-WIDŁA A, et al. Policy labs: the next frontier of policy design and evaluation?[J]. Policy & Politics, 2020, 48(1): 89-110.

KIM S, WELLSTEAD A M, HEIKKILA T. Policy capacity and rise of data-based policy innovation labs[J]. Review of Policy Research, 2023, 40(3): 341-362. .

KALENZI C. Artificial intelligence and blockchain: how should emerging technologies be governed?[J]. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2022, 7: 801549. .

OZKAYA I. Application of large language models to software engineering tasks: opportunities, risks, and implications[J]. IEEE Software, 2023, 40(3): 4-8.

ANDERLJUNG M, BARNHART J, KORINEK A, et al. Frontier ai regulation: managing emerging risks to public safety[EB ] . arXiv preprint, 2023, arXiv: 2307.03718 .

袁方成, 魏玉欣. 数字化转型何以助推敏捷治理? 以淮安"码" 上议工程为分析对象[J]. 行政论坛, 2024, 30(1): 94-106.

YUAN F C, WEI Y X. How digital transformation facilitates agile governance: take the discussion on "code" Project of Huai'an as the object of analysis[J]. Administrative Tribune, 2024, 30(1): 94-106.

WASISTIONO S, ANGGRIAINI W. Three paradigms in government[J]. International Journal of Kybrnology, 2019, 4(2): 79-91.

MARCHANT G, GUIERREZ C I. Soft law 2.0: an agile and effective governance approach for artificial intelligence[J]. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2022, 24(2): 375-424.

TRUBY J, BROWN R D, IBRAHIM I A, et al. A sandbox approach to regulating high-risk artificial intelligence applications[J]. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2022, 13(2): 270-294.

ANTUNES H S, FREITAS P M, OLIVEIRA A L, et al. Multidisciplinary perspectives on artificial intelligence and the law[M].Springer Nature, 2024: 441-457.

张凌寒. 深度合成治理的逻辑更新与体系迭代: ChatGPT等生成型人工智能治理的中国路径[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2023, 41(3): 38-51.

ZHANG L H. Logic update and system iteration of deep synthetic governance: ChatGPT and other generative AI governance in China[J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2023, 41(3): 38-51.

张欣. 生成式人工智能的算法治理挑战与治理型监管[J]. 现代法学, 2023, 45(3): 108-123.

ZHANG X. Algorithmic governance challenges and governance supervision in generative artificial intelligence[J]. Modern Law Science, 2023, 45(3): 108-123.

苏宇. 大型语言模型的法律风险与治理路径[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2024, 42(1): 76-88.

SU Y. Legal risks and governance paths of large language models[J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2024, 42(1): 76-88.

HACKER P, ENGEL A, MAUER M. Regulating ChatGPT and other large generative AI models[C]//In Proceeding of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago US. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023: 1112-1123.

张凌寒. 中国需要一部怎样的《人工智能法》? 中国人工智能立法的基本逻辑与制度架构[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2024, 42(3): 3-17.

ZHANG L H. What kind of "AI law" should China have? Basic logic and systemic structure of China's AI legislative framework[J]. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2024, 42(3): 3-17.

李紫萱. 多元主体参与城市社区人工智能治理的协同路径: 基于敏捷治理理论[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2022, 25(18): 211-214.

LI Z X. Collaborative path of multi-agents participating in artificial intelligence governance in urban communities—based on agile governance theory[J]. China Management Informationization, 2022, 25(18): 211-214.

贾开, 赵静, 傅宏宇. 应对不确定性挑战: 算法敏捷治理的理论界定[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(1): 35-44.

JIA K, ZHAO J, FU H Y. Dealing with challenges of uncertainty: theoretical definition of agile governance on algorithms[J]. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2023, 40(1): 35-44.

LI Y R, FAN Y Y, NIE L. Making governance agile: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in China's local governance[J]. Public Policy and Administration, 2023: 09520767231188229.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Cerberus: a cross-site social bot detection system based on deep learning

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

Postal code：100079
Tel：（010）53879206 Email：cjist@bjxintong.com.cn
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010802024621
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.
Total Visits：161982 Visits Today：145

⁰